Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686049›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

LPC-SonoNet: A Lightweight Network Based on SonoNet and Light Pyramid Convolution for Fetal Ultrasound Standard Plane Detection.

Tianxiang Yu, Po-Hsiang Tsui, Denis Leonov, Shuicai Wu, Guangyu Bin, Zhuhuang Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tianxiang YuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Po-Hsiang TsuiDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5604-1800
Denis LeonovResearch and Education Laboratory, Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department, Moscow 127051, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0916-6552
Shuicai WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Guangyu BinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Zhuhuang ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0570-8473

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 4222001National Science and Technology Council in Taiwan NSTC 112-2221-E-182-006-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of fetal ultrasound standard planes (FUSPs) is important for the diagnosis of fetal malformation and the prevention of perinatal death. As a promising deep-learning technique in FUSP detection, SonoNet's network parameters have a large size. In this paper, we introduced a light pyramid convolution (LPC) block into SonoNet and proposed LPC-SonoNet with reduced network parameters for FUSP detection. The LPC block used pyramid convolution architecture inspired by SimSPPF from YOLOv6 and was able to extract features from various scales with a small parameter size. Using SonoNet64 as the backbone, the proposed network removed one of the convolutional blocks in SonoNet64 and replaced the others with LPC blocks. The proposed LPC-SonoNet model was trained and tested on a publicly available dataset with 12,400 ultrasound images. The dataset with six categories was further divided into nine categories. The images were randomly divided into a training set, a validation set, and a test set in a ratio of 8:1:1. Data augmentation was conducted on the training set to address the data imbalance issue. In the classification of six categories and nine categories, LPC-SonoNet obtained the accuracy of 97.0% and 91.9% on the test set, respectively, slightly higher than the accuracy of 96.60% and 91.70% by SonoNet64. Compared with SonoNet64 with 14.9 million parameters, LPC-SonoNet had a much smaller parameter size (4.3 million). This study pioneered the deep-learning classification of nine categories of FUSPs. The proposed LPC-SonoNet may be used as a lightweight network for FUSP detection.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerUltrasonography, PrenatalAlgorithmsDeep LearningFemaleFetusHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPregnancyconvolutional neural networkdeep learningfetal ultrasoundimage classificationstandard plane

Identifiers

PMID39686049
PMCPMC11644059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.