Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39686001›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Automated Feature-Based Image Registration Strategy for Tool Condition Monitoring in CNC Machine Applications.

Eden Lazar, Kristin S Bennett, Andres Hurtado Carreon, Stephen C Veldhuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eden LazarMcMaster Manufacturing Research Institute (MMRI), Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, 230 Longwood Rd S, Hamilton, ON L8P0A6, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-6238-8464
Kristin S BennettMcMaster Manufacturing Research Institute (MMRI), Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, 230 Longwood Rd S, Hamilton, ON L8P0A6, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-7001-3658
Andres Hurtado CarreonMcMaster Manufacturing Research Institute (MMRI), Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, 230 Longwood Rd S, Hamilton, ON L8P0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-9971
Stephen C VeldhuisMcMaster Manufacturing Research Institute (MMRI), Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, 230 Longwood Rd S, Hamilton, ON L8P0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8209-7499

Funding

National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2019-07096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of Machine Vision (MV) systems for Tool Condition Monitoring (TCM) plays a critical role in reducing the total cost of operation in manufacturing while expediting tool wear testing in research settings. However, conventional MV-TCM edge detection strategies process each image independently to infer edge positions, rendering them susceptible to inaccuracies when tool edges are compromised by material adhesion or chipping, resulting in imprecise wear measurements. In this study, an MV system is developed alongside an automated, feature-based image registration strategy to spatially align tool wear images, enabling a more consistent and accurate detection of tool edge position. The MV system was shown to be robust to the machining environment, versatile across both turning and milling machining centers and capable of reducing tool wear image capturing time up to 85% in reference to standard approaches. A comparison of feature detector-descriptor algorithms found SIFT, KAZE, and ORB to be the most suitable for MV-TCM registration, with KAZE presenting the highest accuracy and ORB being the most computationally efficient. The automated registration algorithm was shown to be efficient, performing registrations in 1.3 s on average and effective across a wide range of tool geometries and coating variations. The proposed tool reference line detection strategy, based on spatially aligned tool wear images, outperformed standard methods, resulting in average tool wear measurement errors of 2.5% and 4.5% in the turning and milling tests, respectively. Such a system allows machine tool operators to more efficiently capture cutting tool images while ensuring more reliable tool wear measurements.

Indexed as

computer vision (CV)condition-based maintenancecondition monitoringimage registrationmachine vision (MV)tool wear monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39686001
PMCPMC11644175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.