ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
An Efficient Printing Defect Detection Based on YOLOv5-DCN-LSK.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MCHB-DETR: An Efficient and Lightweight Inspection Framework for Ink Jet Printing Defects in Semiconductor Packaging.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Bridging Additive Manufacturing and Electronics Printing in the Age of AI.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During the production process of inkjet printing labels, printing defects can occur, affecting the readability of product information. The distinctive shapes and subtlety of printing defects present a significant challenge for achieving high accuracy and rapid detection in existing deep learning-based defect detection systems. To overcome this problem, we propose an improved model based on the structure of the YOLOv5 network to enhance the detection performance of printing defects. The main improvements include the following: First, we introduce the C3-DCN module to replace the C3 module in the backbone network, enhancing the model's ability to detect narrow and elongated defects. Secondly, we incorporate the Large Selective Kernel (LSK) and RepConv modules into the feature fusion network, while also integrating a loss function that combines Normalized Gaussian Wasserstein Distance (NWD) with Efficient IoU (EIoU) to enhance the model's focus on small targets. Finally, we apply model pruning techniques to reduce the model's size and parameter count, thereby achieving faster detection. Experimental results demonstrate that the improved YOLOv5 achieved a mAP@0.5 of 0.741 after training, with 323.2 FPS, which is 2.7 and 20.8% higher than that of YOLOv5, respectively. The method meets the requirements of high precision and high efficiency for printing defect detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.