Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39685964›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Validity of Linear and Nonlinear Measures of Gait Variability to Characterize Aging Gait with a Single Lower Back Accelerometer.

Sophia Piergiovanni, Philippe Terrier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophia PiergiovanniHaute-Ecole Arc Santé, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Philippe TerrierHaute-Ecole Arc Santé, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3693-4505

Funding

HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland -none-
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attractor complexity index (ACI) is a recently developed gait analysis tool based on nonlinear dynamics. This study assesses ACI's sensitivity to attentional demands in gait control and its potential for characterizing age-related changes in gait patterns. Furthermore, we compare ACI with classical gait metrics to determine its efficacy relative to established methods. A 4 × 200 m indoor walking test with a triaxial accelerometer attached to the lower back was used to compare gait patterns of younger (N = 42) and older adults (N = 60) during normal and metronome walking. The other linear and non-linear gait metrics were movement intensity, gait regularity, local dynamic stability (maximal Lyapunov exponents), and scaling exponent (detrended fluctuation analysis). In contrast to other gait metrics, ACI demonstrated a specific sensitivity to metronome walking, with both young and old participants exhibiting altered stride interval correlations. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between the young and old groups (standardized effect size: -0.77). Additionally, older participants exhibited slower walking speeds, a reduced movement intensity, and a lower gait regularity. The ACI is likely a sensitive marker for attentional load and can effectively discriminate age-related changes in gait patterns. Its ease of measurement makes it a promising tool for gait analysis in unsupervised (free-living) conditions.

Indexed as

AccelerometryAgingGaitAdultAgedFemaleGait AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle AgedNonlinear DynamicsWalkingYoung Adultaccelerometersagingfall preventiongait analysisgait variabilitymetronome walkingnonlinear dynamics

Identifiers

PMID39685964
PMCPMC11644259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.