Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39685755›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Diagnosis of Child Sexual Abuse.

Roland Csorba, Zeynep Atas Elfrink, Panagiotis Tsikouras

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roland CsorbaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany.
Zeynep Atas ElfrinkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9561-9388
Panagiotis TsikourasUnit of Maternal-Fetal-Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrake, GR-68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Child sexual abuse (CSA) is a widespread and alarming issue, with an estimated global prevalence of 12-13% (affecting 18% of girls and 8% of boys). Despite its prevalence, many physicians working with children have insufficient knowledge of the medical diagnosis of CSA. This lack of expertise, combined with the sensitive and complex nature of these cases, often hampers proper identification and management. Diagnosing CSA is particularly challenging and requires specialized skills. A majority of children assessed for suspected sexual abuse present with normal genital and anal findings, which complicates the diagnostic process. Barriers such as professional isolation, societal taboos, and the sensitive nature of the subject often result in diagnostic failures. Accurate medical history taking, diagnosis, and documentation of findings are essential for ensuring a precise diagnosis, safeguarding children, and supporting legal proceedings. However, achieving these goals remains elusive without standardized guidelines and adequately trained healthcare professionals. Training of professionals in observing and reporting child sexual abuse is badly needed. This review explores the current state of medical diagnosis in suspected cases of CSA. This article is based on a selective review of pertinent literature retrieved from various databases, including PubMed and the overall index of the Quarterly Update.

Indexed as

child sexual abusedifferential diagnosisforensic documentationmedical diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39685755
PMCPMC11642304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.