ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
Small Diameter (7.5 Fr) Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopy with Direct In-Scope Suction (DISS
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Suction-assisted ureteroscopy compared with traditional ureteroscopy for renal stones ≤ 2 cm: a systematic review, Bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of flexible and navigable suction access sheaths versus traditional access sheath in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative performance of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with and without direct in-scope suction: a retrospective analysis.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Article
- Feasibility of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath in pediatric ureteroscopy: A systematic review from the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology.Asian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Comparison of Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Conventional Ureteric Access Sheath in RIRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Urology research & practice · 2026Article
- Direct in-scope suction (DISS) ureteroscopy: techniques, outcomes and future directions.BJU international · 2026Review
- Editorial: Prevention and treatment of urolithiasis: innovation and novel techniques.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Post ureteroscopy stone status, comparing stone free rate and zero fragment rate - does the difference matter ?World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Review
- Measurement and comparison of intrarenal pressures during retrograde intrarenal surgery using novel flexible ureteroscopes with integrated direct in-scope suction: An experimentalCentral European journal of urology · 2025Article
- Incidence of urinary infections and urosepsis after ureteroscopy for stone disease: a systematic review of literature.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.