ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Shear Stress Solutions for Curved Beams: A Structural Analysis Approach.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The shear stress on isotropic curved beams with compact sections and variable thickness is investigated. Two new solutions, based on Cook's proposal and the mechanics of materials approach, were developed and validated using computational finite element models (FEM) for four typical cross-sections (rectangular, circular, elliptical, and triangular) used in civil and mechanical structures, constituting a novel approach to predicting shear stresses in curved beams. They predict better results than other reported equations, are simpler and easier for engineers to use quickly, and join the group of equations found using the theory of elasticity, thereby expanding the field of knowledge. The results reveal that both equations are suitable to predict the shear stress on a curved beam with outer/inner radii ratios in the interval 1<b/a ≤ 5 aspect ratios. There is a maximum relative difference between the present solutions and finite element models of 8% within 1<b/a ≤ 2, and a maximum of 16% in 2<b/a ≤ 5. Additionally, the neutral axis of the curved beam can be located with the proposed solution and its position matches with that predicted by FEM. The displacement at the top face of the end of the curved beam induces a difference in the shear stress results of 8.0%, 7.0%, 6.5%, and 2.9%, for the circular, rectangular, elliptical, and triangular cross-sections, respectively, when a 3D FEM solution is considered. For small b/a ratios (near 1), the present solutions can be reduced to Collignon's formula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.