ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Development and Application of Flue Gas Desulfurized Gypsum and Blast-Furnace-Slag-Based Grouting Material for Cracked Silty Mudstone.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The grouting technique is an efficient method for enhancing the stability of cracked slopes through the use of grouting materials. Conventional cement-based grouting materials are costly, energy-intensive, and environmentally damaging. Additionally, cement-hardening slurry is prone to cracks between the slurry and the rock. To address these issues, this study proposed an environmentally friendly grouting material composed of flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) and blast furnace slag (BFS) with sodium gluconate (SG) as the additive, especially designed for cracked silty mudstone slopes. The effects of different FGDG-to-BFS ratios and SG dosages on the setting time, fluidity, shrinkage, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), tensile strength, and shear strength parameters of hardened grouting slurries, as well as the interfacial bonding strength between silty mudstone and the hardened slurries, were investigated through laboratory tests. Subsequently, the improvement effects of cement-based material and the FGDG-BFS material on cracked silty mudstone were compared by mechanical tests. Finally, the performance of both types of grouting material on cracked silty mudstone slopes was analyzed by numerical simulations based on GDEM. The results demonstrated that the optimal FGDG-to-BFS ratio was 0.8:1, under which, the mechanical properties of the hardened FGDG-BFS slurries cured for 14 days exceeded those of the silty mudstone. The optimal dosage of SG was 0.4%, effectively prolonging the setting time of the slurry and improving the water resistance of the hardened slurries. The FGDG-BFS material exhibited a superior performance in repairing rock cracks compared to cement-based materials, with the damage patterns of the grouted specimens aligning with those of the intact specimens. This new grouting material effectively repaired existing cracks and prevented re-cracking at the interface between the grouting material and silty mudstone, thereby maintaining slope stability over a long period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.