Meta-Analysis of Materials and Treatments Used in Ophthalmic Lenses: Implications for Lens Characteristics.

Clara Martinez-Perez, Ana Paula Oliveira

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Evaluation of radiation protection by lead glasses for interventional radiology physicians wearing prescription glasses: considering dose reduction by prescription glasses excluding lead.Journal of radiation research · 2025
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clara Martinez-PerezInstituto Superior de Educação e Ciências de Lisboa (ISEC Lisboa), Alameda das Linhas de Torres, 179, 1750-142 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0996-5007

Ana Paula OliveiraInstituto Superior de Educação e Ciências de Lisboa (ISEC Lisboa), Alameda das Linhas de Torres, 179, 1750-142 Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis meta-analysis evaluates the evolution, applications, and recent advancements in the materials and treatments used in ophthalmic lenses, focusing on their effectiveness, comfort, and safety, while also considering sustainability as a key factor.

methodsThe study was registered with PROSPERO and conducted following the PRISMA and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. A systematic review was performed across databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, without time or language restrictions. Observational studies analyzing optical materials and ophthalmic lens treatments were included, and a random-effects model was applied due to the high heterogeneity observed among the studies.

resultsNine studies were included that evaluated different materials, such as CR-39

conclusionsThe materials and treatments evaluated play a crucial role in the optical quality, durability, and comfort of lenses. Although advancements in sustainable materials show promise for reducing environmental impact, challenges remain in terms of cost and production. It is recommended to establish more stringent standards and promote research to improve the consistency and performance of ophthalmic lenses while ensuring sustainability.

Indexed as

lens characteristicslens coatingsmeta-analysisophthalmic lensesoptical materials

Identifiers

PMID39685385

DOI10.3390/ma17235949

PMCPMC11643459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.