Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39685340›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

3D-Printed Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes: A Brief Review of Three Key Fabrication Techniques.

Alexander A Pavlovskii, Konstantin Pushnitsa, Alexandra Kosenko, Pavel Novikov, Anatoliy A Popovich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander A PavlovskiiInstitute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politechnicheskaya ul. 29, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3425-2751
Konstantin PushnitsaInstitute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politechnicheskaya ul. 29, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9972-7549
Alexandra KosenkoInstitute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politechnicheskaya ul. 29, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9096-8570
Pavel NovikovInstitute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politechnicheskaya ul. 29, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9748-6910
Anatoliy A PopovichInstitute of Machinery, Materials and Transport, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politechnicheskaya ul. 29, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5974-6654

Funding

Agreement on the grant in the form of subsidies from the federal budget for the implementation of state support for the creation and development of world-class scientific centers, those are per-forming research and development on the priorities of scienti No. 075-15-2022-311.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, 3D printing has emerged as a promising technology in energy storage, particularly for the fabrication of Li-ion battery electrodes. This innovative manufacturing method offers significant material composition and electrode structure flexibility, enabling more complex and efficient designs. While traditional Li-ion battery fabrication methods are well-established, 3D printing opens up new possibilities for enhancing battery performance by allowing for tailored geometries, efficient material usage, and integrating multifunctional components. This article examines three key 3D printing methods for fabricating Li-ion battery electrodes: (1) material extrusion (ME), which encompasses two subcategories-fused deposition modeling (FDM), also referred to as fused filament fabrication (FFF), and direct ink writing (DIW); (2) material jetting (MJ), including inkjet printing (IJP) and aerosol jet printing (AJP) methods; and (3) vat photopolymerization (VAT-P), which includes the stereolithographic apparatus (SLA) subcategory. These methods have been applied in fabricating substrates, thin-film electrodes, and electrolytes for half-cell and full-cell Li-ion batteries. This discussion focuses on their strengths, limitations, and potential advancements for energy storage applications.

Indexed as

3D-printed batteries3D printinginkjet printinglithium-ion batteries

Identifiers

PMID39685340
PMCPMC11643438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.