ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Quasi-Static and Dynamic Behavior of Silicate Materials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving Dynamic Material Characterization in SHPB Tests Through Optimized Friction Correction.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated both the static and dynamic behavior of silicate materials through a series of experimental and numerical tests. Compression tests were conducted on cubic samples, three-point bending tests on beams, and perforation tests on silicate plates. In the compression tests, stress-strain curves were generated, enabling the calibration of the Concrete Damaged Plasticity (CDP) model for silicate materials. The tensile strength of the silicate was assessed using three-point bending tests, while dynamic perforation tests determined the impact resistance of silicate when subjected to a rigid projectile. The perforation tests provided insight into the failure mechanisms of silicate plates under projectile impact at velocities approaching the ballistic limit. Additionally, the numerical simulations for all the experimental tests were performed using the Abaqus software in order to validate the accuracy of the material behavior model and confirm the appropriateness of the calibrated parameters for the chosen model. The results showed a strong qualitative and quantitative correlation with the experimental data, demonstrating the robustness of the adopted approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.