ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Effect of Specimen Width on the Deformation Behavior and Formability of cp-Ti Grade 4 Sheets During Uniaxial and Cyclic Bending Under Tension Loading.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiment and Modelling of Ultrasonic Vibration-Assisted Creep-Aging Tensile for 7055-T6 Alloy.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the specimen size-dependent deformation behavior of commercially pure titanium grade 4 (cp-Ti grade 4) sheets under tension, with strain paths between uniaxial tension (UT) and plane-strain tension and compares the results with cyclic bending under tension (CBT) data. Specimens of varying widths (11.7, 20, 60, 100, and 140 mm) were tested in both rolling (RD) and transverse (TD) directions. The research employed digital image correlation for full-field strain measurements, finite element simulations, and fracture surface thickness data. Contrary to traditional forming concepts, i.e., the forming limit diagram (FLD) has the lowest major strain at the plane-strain condition, and the fracture forming limit has decreased major strain with increasing (less negative) minor strain, wider specimens exhibited higher major strains at strain localization and fracture under UT. In contrast, CBT findings showed decreased formability with increasing width, i.e., closer to plane-strain deformation, as expected. Strain distribution analyses revealed a transition from nearly uniform deformation in narrow specimens to multiaxial strain states in wider specimens. Thickness measurements along the fracture surface revealed a steeper profile in UT compared to CBT, indicating more localized deformation and necking in UT. In comparison with AA6016-T4, the cp-Ti grade 4 showed greater thickness, suggesting lower susceptibility to localized thinning. Strong anisotropy was observed between the RD and TD, with TD specimens showing higher formability and steeper thickness gradients in UT. Strain fields, along with thickness reduction and adiabatic heating, are used to rationalize the observed width-sensitive deformation behavior of cp-Ti sheets. Notably, CBT improved overall formability compared to UT due to its ability to distribute strain more evenly and delay critical necking. The contrasting trends between simple UT and CBT emphasize the relationship between loading conditions, specimen geometry, and material behavior in determining formability. These findings highlight the ability of the CBT test to create known and desired deformation effects, i.e., lower major strain at failure with increasing specimen width, and more uniform deformation, i.e., consistent thinning across the specimen width, for cp-Ti. Given the observed effects of width in UT, the selection of the testing method is critical for cp-Ti to ensure that results reflect expected material behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.