ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Influence of Internal Architecture and Ink Formulation on the Thermal Behavior of 3D-Printed Cementitious Materials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cement-based 3D printing provides an opportunity to create cement-based elements with a hierarchy of structures and patterns that are not easily achievable using traditional casting techniques, thereby providing new possibilities for improving thermal control and energy storage in cement-based materials. In this study, the influence of internal architecture and ink formulation on the thermal behavior of 3D-printed cement composite beams was investigated using infrared thermal imaging and a conceptual one-dimensional heat transfer model based on cooling fins in convective media. Three-dimensional printed beams with rectilinear, three-dimensional honeycomb, and Archimedean chord infill patterns and cement ink formulations with and without 5% halloysite nanoclay were exposed to a heating source at one end. The thermal behavior of the beams was found to be predominantly influenced by their internal architecture rather than the cement ink formulation, with differences in void structures and heat transfer pathways among the different architectures resulting in a hierarchy of apparent thermal conductivity. The internal architecture resulted in a reduction in apparent thermal conductivity by up to 75%, while the incorporation of halloysite nanoclay in the cement ink led to a reduction of up to 14%. Among the tested internal architecture, the rectilinear architecture showed a 10-15% higher apparent thermal conductivity compared to the three-dimensional honeycomb architecture and a 35-40% higher apparent thermal conductivity than the Archimedean architecture. The research demonstrates a promising strategy for fabricating and evaluating cement-based materials with thermal management capabilities using 3D printing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.