ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Prediction of Concrete Compressive Strength Based on ISSA-BPNN-AdaBoost.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Strength testing of concrete mainly relies on physical experiments, which are not only time-consuming but also costly. To solve this problem, machine learning has proven to be a promising technological tool in concrete strength prediction. In order to improve the accuracy of the model in predicting the compressive strength of concrete, this paper chooses to optimize the base learner of the ensemble learning model. The position update formula in the search phase of the sparrow search algorithm (SSA) is improved, and piecewise chaotic mapping and adaptive t-distribution variation are added, which enhances the diversity of the population and improves the algorithm's global search and convergence abilities. Subsequently, the effectiveness of the improvement strategy was demonstrated by comparing improved sparrow search algorithm (ISSA) with some commonly used intelligent optimization algorithms on 10 test functions. A back propagation neural network (BPNN) optimized with ISSA was used as the base learner, and the adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) algorithm was used to train and integrate multiple base learners, thus establishing an adaptive boosting algorithm based on back propagation neural network improved by the improved sparrow search algorithm (ISSA-BPNN-AdaBoost) concrete compressive strength prediction model. Then comparison experiments were conducted with other ensemble models and single models on two strength prediction datasets. The experimental results show that the ISSA-BPNN-AdaBoost model exhibits excellent results on both datasets and can accurately perform the prediction of concrete compressive strength, demonstrating the superiority of ensemble learning in predicting concrete compressive strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.