Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39685048›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Emergency Departments in Contemporary Healthcare: Are They Still for Emergencies? An Analysis of over 1 Million Attendances.

Arian Zaboli, Gianni Turcato, Gloria Brigiari, Magdalena Massar, Marta Ziller, Serena Sibilio, Francesco Brigo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arian ZaboliInnovation, Research and Teaching Service (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4204-8884
Gianni TurcatoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Intermediate Care Unit, Hospital Alto Vicentino (AULSS-7), 36014 Santorso, Italy.
Gloria BrigiariUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35129 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-7274-4373
Magdalena MassarInnovation, Research and Teaching Service (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Marta ZillerCardiology Department, Hospital of Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-3890-3856
Serena SibilioDepartment Public Health, Institute of Nursing Science, Universitat Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.
Francesco BrigoInnovation, Research and Teaching Service (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), 39100 Bolzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past few decades, emergency departments (EDs) have experienced an increasing workload. However, the variation in the types of patient accesses to these departments remains poorly understood.

objectiveTo evaluate the 5-year temporal trend in the volume of patients attending EDs based on the urgency of their conditions.

methodsThis multicenter observational retrospective study was conducted from 1 January 2019, to 31 December 2023, across seven Italian EDs located within the same province. All patients accessing the EDs during the study period were included, totaling 1,282,735 patients. The triage code was used as an urgency index; non-urgent patients were defined as those who received a code 4 or 5 in triage, while urgent patients were defined as those who received a code 3, 2, or 1 in triage. Temporal analyses of admissions were conducted, also evaluating individual age groups to understand behavior over time.

resultsFrom 2019 to 2023, there was a significant 10% increase in ED attendances by non-urgent patients. This increase was observed during both daytime and nighttime shifts. Notably, all age groups showed an increase in non-urgent patients, except for pediatric patients aged 0 to 14.

conclusionsOver the past 5 years, there has been a consistent upward trend in ED attendances by non-urgent patients. Healthcare policies should consider implementing strategies to manage or mitigate the overload in EDs, particularly related to non-urgent patient accesses.

Indexed as

emergency departmenthealth policyhealth services needs and demandnon-urgent caretriageurgent careworkload

Identifiers

PMID39685048
PMCPMC11641709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.