Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39685015›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Development of Algorithms for Individual Ranges of Body Temperature and Oxygen Saturation in Healthy and Frail Individuals.

Märta Sund Levander, Ewa Grodzinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nursing management decisions in fever: a mixed-methods approach to understanding.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Märta Sund LevanderDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Medical Faculty, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1281-885X
Ewa GrodzinskyDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Medical Faculty, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

As guest editors for Special Issue in Healthcare No number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesIndividual habitual conditions entail a risk during the interpretation of vital parameters. We developed algorithms for calculating, validating, and interpreting individual normal ranges of body temperature and oxygen saturation.

methodsIn total, 70 healthy individuals aged 27 to 80 and 52 frail individuals aged 60 to 100 were included. Data on individual conditions comprised age, gender, physical ability, chronic disease, and medication. Ear temperature and oxygen saturation were measured for five mornings before the participants got out of bed and consumed medicine, food, or drink.

resultsThe range for body temperature was 34.3 °C to 37.7 °C, with a variation of 0.7 °C ± 0.4 °C. The variation in minimum and maximum temperatures was 2.4 °C vs. 2.7 °C and 2.9 °C vs. 2.3 °C in healthy and frail subjects, respectively. The range for oxygen saturation was 85% to 99% in healthy individuals and 75% to 100% in frail individuals. The variation between minimum and maximum oxygen saturation was 13% vs. 25% and 4% vs. 17% in healthy and frail subjects, respectively.

conclusionsTo promote the implementation of precision medicine in clinical practice, it is necessary to interpret body temperature and oxygen saturation based on individual habitual conditions. Interpreting deviations from an individual's normal ranges allows healthcare professionals to provide necessary treatment without delay, which can be decisive in preventing further deterioration.

Indexed as

algorithmsbody temperaturehabitual conditionindividual normalinterpretationoxygen saturationprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID39685015
PMCPMC11641774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.