ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
An Evaluation of Medication Adherence in New Tuberculosis Cases in Ankara: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-adherence and its predictors among pediatric household contacts on tuberculosis preventive therapy in the 3HP era: A multicenter observational study.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe objective of this study was to investigate the factors influencing adherence with tuberculosis medication therapy. Non-adherence can result in treatment failure, ongoing infectiousness, and the development of drug resistance. Therefore, understanding the reasons behind non-adherence is crucial for achieving the World Health Organization's target of 90% treatment success.
methodsData were collected prospectively from a cohort at three different tuberculosis dispensaries (TBDs), with participants being followed up with at face-to-face visits every two months for a total of three visits.
resultsIn this study, the adherence rates among participants were the highest during the intensive treatment phase (81.0% at the first follow-up) but declined during the continuation phase, reaching 69.4% at the second follow-up (at the end of the fourth month of treatment) and 71.1% at the third follow-up (at the end of the sixth month of treatment) according to self-reports for the past 30 days. According to the generalised estimating equations method, factors significantly associated with better adherence included knowledge of infectiousness, daily access to medication, workplace permissions, high household income, regular sleep patterns, extrapulmonary TB, secondary education, and no alcohol consumption.
conclusionsNon-adherence with anti-TB medication has been observed in patients with TB, particularly during the continuation phase of treatment. Interventions targeting patients who experience frequent forgetfulness, adverse drug reactions, or a lack of workplace flexibility may help to improve adherence. In addition, providing personalised health education that highlights the risks of non-adherence and emphasises the infectious nature of TB could improve understanding and commitment to treatment. Ensuring regular follow-ups and support, particularly for those with lower socioeconomic status or limited social support, can further reinforce the importance of adherence in TB treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.