ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Uncertainty Quantification and Flagging of Unreliable Predictions in Predicting Mass Spectrometry-Related Properties of Small Molecules Using Machine Learning.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Candidate Structure Prioritization in Non-Target Screening with Predicted Collision Cross-Sections and Uncertainty Quantification.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mass spectral identification (in particular, in metabolomics) can be refined by comparing the observed and predicted properties of molecules, such as chromatographic retention. Significant advancements have been made in predicting these values using machine learning and deep learning. Usually, model predictions do not contain any indication of the possible error (uncertainty) or only one criterion is used for this purpose. The spread of predictions of several models included in the ensemble, and the molecular similarity of the considered molecule and the most "similar" molecule from the training set, are values that allow us to estimate the uncertainty. The Euclidean distance between vectors, calculated based on real-valued molecular descriptors, can be used for the assessment of molecular similarity. Another factor indicating uncertainty is the molecule's belonging to one of the clusters (data set clustering). Together, all three factors can be used as features for the uncertainty assessment model. Classification models that predict whether a prediction belongs to the worst 15% were obtained. The area under the receiver operating curve value is in the range of 0.73-0.82 for the considered tasks: the prediction of retention indices in gas chromatography, retention times in liquid chromatography, and collision cross-sections in ion mobility spectroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.