Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39684708›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Gut-Microbiota-Derived Butyric Acid Overload Contributes to Ileal Mucosal Barrier Damage in Late Phase of Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress Mice.

Chen Wang, Mei Qiu, Shuo Wang, Jinjin Luo, Ling Huang, Qi Deng, Zhijia Fang, Lijun Sun, Ravi Gooneratne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Lanzhou Lily (Food science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The anti-obesity effects ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chen WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China.
Mei QiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China.
Shuo WangCollege of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Jinjin LuoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China.
Ling HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China.
Qi DengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China.
Zhijia FangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9370-2452
Lijun SunGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, College of Food Science and Technology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8722-6384
Ravi GooneratneDepartment of Wine, Food and Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, P.O. Box 85084, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5406-2894

Funding

Characteristic Innovation Project of Colleges and Universities in Guangdong Province No. 2020KQNCX025Innovative Team Program of High Education of Guangdong Province No. 2021KCXTD021National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 32172215Outstanding Dissertation Cultivation Program (PhD), Guangdong Ocean University No. 202319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal mucosal barrier damage is regarded as the critical factor through which chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) leads to a variety of physical and mental health problems. However, the exact mechanism by which CUMS induces intestinal mucosal barrier damage is unclear. In this study, 14, 28, and 42 d CUMS model mice were established. The indicators related to ileal mucosal barrier damage (IMBD), the composition of the ileal microbiota and its amino acid (AA) and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) metabolic functions, and free amino acid (FAA) and SCFA levels in the ileal lumen were measured before and after each stress period. The correlations between them are analyzed to investigate how CUMS induces intestinal mucosal barrier damage in male C57BL/6 mice. With the progression of CUMS, butyric acid (BA) levels decreased (14 and 28 d) and then increased (42 d), and IMBD progressively increased. In the late CUMS stage (42 d), the degree of IMBD is most severe and positively correlated with significantly increased BA levels (

Indexed as

Butyric AcidGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIleumIntestinal MucosaMice, Inbred C57BLStress, PsychologicalAmino AcidsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFatty Acids, VolatileMaleMiceAmino AcidsButyric AcidFatty Acids, Volatileamino acid metabolismbutyric acidchronic unpredictable mild stressdepression behaviorgut microbiotaileal mucosal barrier damageinflammationintestinal stem cellperiodic effects

Identifiers

PMID39684708
PMCPMC11641654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.