ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Understanding the Preclinical Efficacy of Antibody-Drug Conjugates.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Rational payload selection enables high antitumoral efficacy of an anti-EGFR antibody-drug conjugate against ovarian tumors.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of Resistance and Synergy: The Role of Tumor Microenvironment in HER2-Low Breast Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Monoclonal Antibodies and Derivatives: Therapeutic Tools for Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Review
- Reprogramming the tumor microenvironment: synergistic mechanisms of antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors.Antibody therapeutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a therapeutic modality that guides chemotherapies to tumoral cells by using antibodies against tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). The antibody and the chemotherapy or payload are attached by a chemical structure called the linker. The strategy for the development of this type of drug was based on several rational pillars, including the use of a very potent payload and the use of specific antibodies acting only on antigens expressed on tumoral cells. In this article, by using data from all approved ADCs that have received regulatory approval, we analyze the potential contribution of each ADC component to preclinical activity. We suggest that payload potency and the drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) have a less relevant role in relation to efficacy than previously considered. Additionally, we have observed that some ADCs have been developed against antigens also present in non-transformed tissues, which could suggest that TAA specificity is not a mandatory requirement. Finally, we have identified that ADCs with payloads harboring more favorable physicochemical characteristics showed better potential activity. In this article, we also review other aspects that should be taken into consideration for ADC design, including linker structure, stability, conjugation type, pharmacokinetics, receptor internalization, and recycling. Based on currently available data, our study summaries different concepts that should be considered in the design of novel ADCs in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.