ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Development and Validation of a Novel Four Gene-Pairs Signature for Predicting Prognosis in DLBCL Patients.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Because individual clinical outcomes of DLBCL in response to standard therapy differ widely, new treatment strategies are being investigated to improve therapeutic efficacy. In this study, we identified a novel signature for stratification of DLBCL useful for prognosis prediction and treatment selection. First, 408 prognostic gene sets were selected from approximately 2500 DLBCL samples in public databases, from which four gene-pair signatures consisting of seven prognostic genes were identified by Cox regression analysis. Then, the risk score was calculated based on these gene-pairs and we validated the risk score as a prognostic predictor for DLBCL patient outcomes. This risk score demonstrated independent predictive performance even when combined with other clinical parameters and molecular subtypes. Evaluating external DLBCL cohorts, we demonstrated that the risk-scoring model based the four gene-pair signatures leads to stable predictive performance, compared with nine existing predictive models. Finally, high-risk DLBCL showed high resistance to DNA damage caused by anticancer drugs, suggesting that this characteristic is responsible for the unfavorable prognosis of high-risk DLBCL patients. These results provide a novel index for classifying the biological characteristics of DLBCL and clearly indicate the importance of genetic analyses in the treatment of DLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.