ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Exploring Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Mechanical Asphyxia in the Heart Based on Proteomics Technology.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Proteomic and Transcriptomic Profiling Identifies Candidate Biomarkers for Discriminating Anaphylactic from Cardiac Sudden Death.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Combined machine learning identification and experimental validation of NDUFS8 and SUCLG1 as potential biomarkers for mechanical asphyxia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Integrated plasma metabolomic and proteomic analysis uncover the effects and mechanisms of isotretinoin in severe acne.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical asphyxia presents a challenging diagnostic issue in forensic medicine due to its often covert nature, and the signs visible during an autopsy are usually not specific. Despite some progress in understanding hypoxia's effects, traditional methods' inherent limitations might overlook new biomarkers in mechanical asphyxia. This study employed 4D-DIA proteomics to explore the protein expression profiles of cardiac samples under conditions of mechanical asphyxia. Proteomic analysis identified 271 and 371 differentially expressed proteins in the strangulation and suffocation groups, respectively, compared to the control group. Seventy-eight differentially expressed proteins were identified across different mechanical asphyxia groups compared to the control group. GO and KEGG analysis showed enrichment in pathways, including complement and coagulation cascades, cAMP and cGMP-PKG signaling pathways, inflammatory mediator regulation of TRP channels, and phagosomes. Through stringent selection based on protein interactions, ALKBH5, NAA10, and CLPB were identified as potential diagnostic biomarkers. ALKBH5 showed increased expression in asphyxia models, while NAA10 and CLPB were downregulated; these biomarker changes were validated in both animal models and human cardiac samples. This study highlights the potential of proteomics in discovering reliable biomarkers, which can enhance the specificity of mechanical asphyxia diagnosis in forensic practice, provide new insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of mechanical asphyxia, and offer new perspectives for diagnosing mechanical asphyxia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.