ArticlePolymers2024
Compatibilizer Efficiency in Enhancing Marine Plastic Waste Valorization Through Simulated Recycled Plastic Blends.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the optimal combination of compatibilizers and stabilizers to enhance the value of marine environment plastic (MEP). The composition of the plastics was analysed, and a simulated recycled plastic blend (sMEP) was prepared based on a simplified composition of actual MEP. Different concentrations of three commercial compatibilizers (C1, C2 and C3) were tested to improve tensile strength. The tensile tests indicated that the blend compatibilized with 10 wt.% C3 (polypropylene grafted with maleic anhydride) exhibited the highest increase in tensile strength. This optimal compatibilization was then combined with two commercial stabilizers and applied to a simulated MEP blend. Scanning electron microscopy images showed that all blends had a continuous polyethylene phase with dispersed poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and polypropylene (PP) droplets. The simulated blend with 10 wt.% C3 exhibited a reduced PET droplet size in the dispersed phase. Differential scanning calorimetry results revealed a decrease in polyethylene crystallinity and an increase in PP crystallinity. The improved properties of the blend were attributed to the effectiveness of the C3 compatibilizer in enhancing the interface between the PP and PET phases. An effective formulation was developed to valorise marine-sourced plastics by leveraging existing scientific knowledge and accessible commercial additives. Applying this enhanced formulation to real MEP not only demonstrated its effectiveness, but also highlighted a practical approach for reducing plastic pollution and supporting circular economy principles, contributing to environmental conservation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.