ArticlePolymers2024
Experimental and Numerical Study on the Impact Response of Composite Sandwich Structures with Different Cores.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Sandwich Structures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study analyzes the impact mechanical response of sandwich structures with foam and wood cores through experimental and numerical methods. The aim is to determine whether a sustainable core material, such as cork wood, can serve as a reliable alternative to the commonly used Polystyrene (PS) foam core in sandwich structures. Impact experiments were conducted at varying energy levels using an INSTRON CEAST 9350 drop tower, demonstrating the superiority of sandwich structures compared to single-material alternatives. Numerical models were developed in ABAQUS, where glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite panels were represented using solid element C3D8R and the 3D Hashin failure criteria, which were incorporated via the user subroutine VUMAT. The results indicate that the contact force of the sandwich structure with a wood core surpassed that of the foam core counterpart. In both sandwich structures, damage initially occurred at the impact point on the surface, leading to plastic deformation and damage within the core, while the composite panel on the rear surface ultimately failed. These findings provide valuable insights for designers, enabling parametric studies to select appropriate core materials that enhance the impact resistance of sandwich structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.