ArticlePolymers2024
Testing, Experimental Design, and Numerical Analysis of Nanomechanical Properties in Epoxy Hybrid Systems Reinforced with Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Nanoparticles.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High Removal Rates and Atomically Smooth Surfaces Are Achieved on Silicon Wafers Using the New SiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Organic Reinforcements on the Structural and Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Dental Composites.Cureus · 2026Article
- Overall Performance Enhancement of Epoxy Resins Loaded with Non-Covalently Modified Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Nanosheets.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hybrid nanocomposites incorporating multiple fillers are gaining significant attention due to their ability to enhance material performance, offering superior properties compared to traditional monophase systems. This study investigates hybrid epoxy-based nanocomposites reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and graphene nanosheets (GNs), introduced at two different weight concentrations of the mixed filler, i.e., 0.1 wt% and 0.5 wt% which are, respectively, below and above the Electrical Percolation Threshold (EPT) for the two binary polymer composites that solely include one of the two nanofillers, with varying MWCNTs:GNs ratios. Mechanical properties, such as contact depth, hardness, and reduced modulus, were experimentally assessed via nanoindentation, while morphological analysis supported the mechanical results. A Design of Experiments (DoE) approach was utilized to evaluate the influence of filler concentrations on the composite's mechanical performance, and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was applied to derive a mathematical model correlating the filler ratios with key mechanical properties. The best and worst-performing formulations, based on hardness and contact depth results, were further investigated through detailed numerical simulations using a multiphysics software. After validation considering experimental data, the simulations provided additional insights into the mechanical behavior of the hybrid composites. This work aims to contribute to the knowledge base on hybrid composites and promote the use of computational modeling techniques for optimizing the design and mechanical performance of advanced materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.