ArticlePolymers2024
Evaluating Processing Parameter Effects on Polymer Grades and Plastic Coloring: Insights from Experimental Design and Characterization Studies.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Study of Raw and HMDS-Treated Pigment-Rich Agro-Industrial By-Products as Functional Fillers in PDMS Composites.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Data-Driven Modeling and Simulation for Optimizing Color in Polycarbonate: The Dominant Role of Processing Speed on Pigment Dispersion and Rheology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimization and Simulation of Extrusion Parameters in Polymer Compounding: A Comparative Study Using BBD and 3LFFD.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resolving material and processing issues is essential to improving formulations and attaining accurate color matching in blending. Two transparent polycarbonate resins made up the blend: PC1, which made up 33% of the mixture with a Melt Flow Index (MFI) of 25 g/min, and PC2, which made up 67% of the mixture with an MFI of 65 g/min. This study employed data mining and a well-structured experiment using Design of Experiment (DoE) software-8 to investigate the effects of various processing temperatures on identical material formulations. The primary objective was to understand the influence of the operating conditions on the viscosity of a red letdown pigment made of polycarbonate, both with additive (WA) and without additive (WOA). The study analyzed the effects of processing parameters and rheological properties using a co-rotating twin-screw extruder. Rheology, Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) were employed to compare results and evaluate their impact on minimizing color discrepancies and improving Single-Pass Color Uniformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.