Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39684115›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Additive Fabrication of Polyaniline and Carbon-Based Composites for Energy Storage.

Niwat Hemha, Jessada Khajonrit, Wiwat Nuansing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Niwat HemhaSchool of Physics, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.
Jessada KhajonritDepartment of Science and Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Health Technology, Kalasin University, Kalasin 46000, Thailand.
Wiwat NuansingSchool of Physics, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2959-7085

Funding

Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI), and (iii) the National Science, Research, and Innovation Fund (NSRF) 195673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing demand for efficient energy storage systems, particularly in portable electronics and electric vehicles, has led to increased interest in supercapacitors, which offer high power density, rapid charge/discharge rates, and long cycle life. However, improving their energy density without compromising performance remains a challenge. In this study, we developed novel 3D-printed reduced graphene oxide (rGO) electrodes coated with polyaniline (PANI) to enhance their electrochemical properties. The rGO 3D-printed electrodes were fabricated using direct ink writing (DIW), which allowed precise control over thickness, ranging from 4 to 24 layers. A unique ink formulation was optimized for the printing process, consisting of rGO, cellulose acetate (CA) as a binder, and acetone as a solvent. The PANI coating was applied via chemical oxidative polymerization (COP) with up to five deposition cycles. Electrochemical testing, including cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), revealed that 12-layer electrodes with three PANI deposition cycles achieved the highest areal capacitance of 84.32 mF/cm

Indexed as

3D printingcellulose acetate (CA)direct ink writing (DIW)polyaniline (PANI)rGOsupercapacitor

Identifiers

PMID39684115
PMCPMC11644309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.