Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39684112›Full record

ReviewPolymers2024

Machine Learning-Based Process Optimization in Biopolymer Manufacturing: A Review.

Ivan Malashin, Dmitriy Martysyuk, Vadim Tynchenko, Andrei Gantimurov, Andrey Semikolenov, Vladimir Nelyub, Aleksei Borodulin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Recent Advances in Silk Fibroin Derived fromJournal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Therapeutic Prospects ofMarine drugs · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ivan MalashinBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0008-8986-402X
Dmitriy MartysyukBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1563-4036
Vadim TynchenkoBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3959-2969
Andrei GantimurovBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey SemikolenovBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir NelyubBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4263-2367
Aleksei BorodulinBauman Moscow State Technical University, 105005 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9648-2395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of machine learning (ML) into material manufacturing has driven advancements in optimizing biopolymer production processes. ML techniques, applied across various stages of biopolymer production, enable the analysis of complex data generated throughout production, identifying patterns and insights not easily observed through traditional methods. As sustainable alternatives to petrochemical-based plastics, biopolymers present unique challenges due to their reliance on variable bio-based feedstocks and complex processing conditions. This review systematically summarizes the current applications of ML techniques in biopolymer production, aiming to provide a comprehensive reference for future research while highlighting the potential of ML to enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and improve product quality. This review also shows the role of ML algorithms, including supervised, unsupervised, and deep learning algorithms, in optimizing biopolymer manufacturing processes.

Indexed as

biopolymersmaterials scienceMLprocess optimization

Identifiers

PMID39684112
PMCPMC11644666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.