ReviewPolymers2024
Formulation of Epoxy Prepregs, Synthesization Parameters, and Resin Impregnation Approaches-A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fiber-Matrix Interface Engineering in Polymer Composites: Linking Surface Chemistry to Multiscale Mechanical Performance.Polymers · 2026Review
- Mechanical and physical properties investigations of carbon fiber prepreg composites fabricated by the out-of-autoclave method with rapid curing for prosthetic foot applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mold Surface Optimization and Process Parameter Investigation for Preforming in Advanced Pultrusion of Composite Structures.Polymers · 2026Article
- Multifunctional Bamboo Fiber/Epoxy Composites Featuring Integrated Superhydrophobicity and Enhanced Mechanical-Thermal Performance.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Influence of the Manufacturing Technology on the Mechanical Properties of Woven Jute Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Composites.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prepregs are resin-impregnated, expensive composites mainly limited to high-end applications within the aeronautical, defense, automotive, and energy sectors. Prepreg technology is mainly protected by trade secrets, resulting in limited studies on prepreg resin matrix development and recent advancements. Three key parameters for epoxy resin matrix development including B-staging, viscosity, and tackiness, and their control strategies are discussed in detail. The B-stage is defined as the partially cured stage of epoxy prepregs and is extremely important for prepreg layup, pot life, and final performances. The three key parameters are interrelated and accurately controlled, and, hence, resin development plays a huge role in the prepreg development process. This review also discusses the measuring techniques of the parameters in detail. Based on the resin impregnation techniques and B-stage control, two approaches are proposed to develop the prepreg resin formulations: conventional resin impregnation and viscosity-controlled resin impregnation. The approaches would be extremely useful, especially for advancing beyond the existing prepreg applications and developing smart materials and functional composites through advanced resin modification strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.