ArticlePolymers2024
Performance Optimization Approach of Polymer-Modified Asphalt Mixtures with PET and PE Waste.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance Evaluation of Hot Mix Asphalt Modified with Biomass-Based Waste Chestnut Shells as Filler Replacement.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Review of Marshall and Superpave Mix Designs: Enhancing Asphalt Performance with Polymers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A State-of-the-Practice Review on the Challenges of Asphalt Binder and a Roadmap Towards Sustainable Alternatives-A Call to Action.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Road infrastructure sustainability and pavement performance may be increased by using waste materials like polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyethylene waste (PE waste) in polymer-modified asphalt mixtures. As seen by a more pronounced rise in the softening point, which exceeds 110 °C with 8% PE waste, PET was found to improve the tensile strength, resistance to cracking, and thermal stability of asphalt mixes. PE waste also increases ductility up to 4% PE waste, beyond which the combination becomes more brittle, and dramatically decreases penetration, strengthening the asphalt's resistance to deformation. Additionally, bitumen treated with PE waste is more workable than asphalt without PET, even though bitumen treated with PE waste had a viscosity of up to 4500 Pa. Complex shear modules decreased as the PE waste and PET content increased. PET, on the other hand, increases the binder's overall stiffness, elasticity, and tensile strength. Nevertheless, when PET content rises, ductility steadily decreases. Previous studies concentrated on the effects of each component separately, and this paper fills this knowledge gap by investigating the combined effects of PET and PE waste. The results indicate that the highest compressive strength (7.5 MPa) was obtained with 6% PE + 2% PET, while the highest tensile strength (1.40 MPa) was achieved with a balanced mix of 4% PE waste + 4% PET. Additionally, the viscosity of asphalt is increased by PET and PE waste, enhancing its performance at high temperatures. These findings demonstrate how combining PET and PE waste improves the mechanical and thermal characteristics of asphalt, providing a balance between stiffness and flexibility, a crucial feature for durable road materials under a variety of circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.