Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39684048›Full record

ReviewPolymers2024

Advances and Challenges in Polymer-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Path Towards Personalized Regenerative Medicine.

Samira Farjaminejad, Rosana Farjaminejad, Melika Hasani, Franklin Garcia-Godoy, Majid Abdouss, Anand Marya, Ari Harsoputranto, Abdolreza Jamilian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Freeze-Dried CS/PVP/PVA Composite Scaffolds Doped with Curcumin and SiOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samira FarjaminejadDepartment of Health Services Research and Management, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-8339-0272
Rosana FarjaminejadDepartment of Health Services Research and Management, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-7795-0444
Melika HasaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1955847781, Iran.
Franklin Garcia-GodoyDepartment of Bioscience Research, Bioscience Research Center, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 875 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8133-3306
Majid AbdoussDepartment of Chemistry, Amirkabir University of Technology (AUT), Tehran 1591634311, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2305-7985
Anand MaryaDeputy-Dean of Dentistry (Research) & Program, Director of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh 55 180, Cambodia.ORCID 0000-0003-2009-4393
Ari HarsoputrantoCity of London Dental School, University of Bolton, London BL3 5AB, UK.
Abdolreza JamilianCity of London Dental School, University of Bolton, London BL3 5AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8841-0447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymers have become essential in advancing bone tissue engineering, providing adaptable bone healing and regeneration solutions. Their biocompatibility and biodegradability make them ideal candidates for creating scaffolds that mimic the body's natural extracellular matrix (ECM). However, significant challenges remain, including degradation by-products, insufficient mechanical strength, and suboptimal cellular interactions. This article addresses these challenges by evaluating the performance of polymers like poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), polycaprolactone (PCL), and polylactic acid (PLA) in scaffold development. It also explores recent innovations, such as intelligent polymers, bioprinting, and the integration of bioactive molecules to enhance scaffold efficacy. We propose that overcoming current limitations requires a combination of novel biomaterials, advanced fabrication techniques, and tailored regulatory strategies. The future potential of polymer-based scaffolds in personalised regenerative medicine is discussed, focusing on their clinical applicability.

Indexed as

bone regenerationpolymersregenerative medicinescaffoldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39684048
PMCPMC11644794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.