ArticlePolymers2024
Investigation of Mechanical Properties and Oil Resistance of Hydrogenated-Butadiene-Acrylonitrile-Rubber-Based Composites Across Various Temperatures.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Optimization of NBR/ACM Blends with Dual Vulcanization System and Suitability for Transformer Sealing.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The influence of molecular structure (acrylonitrile content) and formulation (carbon black and plasticizer dosage) on the rheological and mechanical properties of HNBR composites was systematically studied, with further discussion on ozone resistance and swelling behavior in transformer oil. The results demonstrated that the curing characteristics and rheological behavior of HNBR composites are closely linked to acrylonitrile content, carbon black, and plasticizer levels. Plasticizers significantly reduced the degree of crosslinking and the Payne effect, while fillers had the opposite impact. Fillers increased the modulus at 100% and 200%, reducing elongation at break, whereas plasticizers enhanced elongation at break while lowering the modulus. The effects of fillers and plasticizers on tensile strength were relatively minor. Both exhibited different influences on mechanical properties at various aging temperatures. Compression set testing revealed that under a 125 °C hot air environment, the compression set was less than 30%, while at -30 °C in cold air, it exceeded 60%. In a 125 °C hot transformer oil environment, the compression set ranged between 30% and 60%. Oil resistance tests indicated that HNBR composites with higher acrylonitrile content showed lower mass change rates in transformer oil, with further reduction achieved by increasing the plasticizer or filler content. Due to their excellent performance and resistance to ozone cracking, HNBR composites have significant potential for applications in high-altitude power grids and military-grade rubber sealing products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.