Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39683897›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Mechanochemical Activation of Waste Clay Brick Powder with Addition of Waste Glass Powder and Its Influence on Pozzolanic Reactivity.

Csilla Őze, Nikolett Badacsonyi, Éva Makó

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Csilla ŐzeDepartment of Materials Engineering, University of Pannonia, P.O. Box 1158, H-8210 Veszprém, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0711-9648
Nikolett BadacsonyiDepartment of Materials Engineering, University of Pannonia, P.O. Box 1158, H-8210 Veszprém, Hungary.
Éva MakóDepartment of Materials Engineering, University of Pannonia, P.O. Box 1158, H-8210 Veszprém, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of industrially used supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs, e.g., fly ash) decreases due to the rise in renewable energy sources and recycling technologies. Therefore, it is essential to find alternative SCMs (e.g., waste glass and clay brick powder) that are locally available. Accordingly, in this paper, the mechanochemical activation of clay brick waste (CBW) with abrasive glass powder (GP) and its pozzolanic reactivity are investigated. The mixtures of CBW and GP in mass ratios of 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, and 25:75 were mechanochemically activated for 15, 30, 45, and 60 min. The physical, chemical, and structural changes of the mixtures were examined by X-ray diffractometry, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and specific surface area measurements. The pozzolanic reactivity was characterized by the active silica content and the 28-day compressive strength of the binders (a mixture of ordinary Portland cement and activated material). The addition of GP favorably reduced the agglomeration and increased the active silica content of the activated mixtures (e.g., by 7-37% m/m at 15 min of mechanochemical activation). The 60 min of mechanochemical activation and the addition of 50% m/m of GP can increase the compressive strength by approximately 8%. Economically, the addition of 50% m/m of GP was found to be favorable, where only 30 min of mechanochemical activation resulted in a considerable increase in strength compared to that of the ordinary Portland cement.

Indexed as

clay brickCO2 emissionglassmechanochemical activationmortarplanetary ball millpozzolansustainabilitywaste

Identifiers

PMID39683897
PMCPMC11643311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.