Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39683879›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Automated Systems with Fluorescence Detection for Metal Determination: A Review.

Arina Skok, Natalia Manousi, Aristidis Anthemidis, Yaroslav Bazel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arina SkokDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Moyzesova 11, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-7351-7826
Natalia ManousiLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, School of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1516-8012
Aristidis AnthemidisLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, School of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0276-3349
Yaroslav BazelDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Moyzesova 11, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia.

Funding

Scientific Grant Agency VEGA of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic 1/0177/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industrialization has led to environmental pollution with various hazardous chemicals including pollution with metals. In this regard, the development of highly efficient analytical methods for their determination has received considerable attention to ensure public safety. Currently, scientists are paying more and more attention to the automation of analytical methods, since it permits fast, accurate, and sensitive analysis with minimal exposure of analysts to hazardous substances. This review discusses the automated methods with fluorescent detection developed for metal determination since 2000. It is evident that flow-injection analysis (FIA) with no preconcentration or with solid-phase preconcentration are predominant compared to liquid-phase preconcentration systems. FIA systems are also more widespread than sequential injection analysis (SIA) systems. Moreover, a significant number of works have been devoted to chromatography-based methods. Atomic fluorescence detectors significantly prevail over molecular fluorescence detectors. It must be highlighted that most of the methods result in good figures of merit and performance characteristics, demonstrating their superiority in comparison with manual systems.

Indexed as

automationflow-injection analysisfluorescence detectionmetal determinationsequential injection analysis

Identifiers

PMID39683879
PMCPMC11643265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.