How to Evaluate the Chemical Affinity of -OH and -COOH Functional Groups Toward U(VI).

Xuemei Cui, Xiaoying Xie, Yun Li, Yue Chen, Yan Ma, Shubin Yang

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

Chitin/Graphene Oxide Composite Materials for Heavy-Metal-Ion Adsorption.ACS omega · 2026
Article
MOF-decorated track-etched membranes for the U(VI) ions sorption removal.Scientific reports · 2025
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xuemei CuiSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.

Xiaoying XieSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.

Yun LiSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.

Yue ChenYantai-Jingshi Institute of Material Genome Engineering, Yantai 264006, China.

Yan MaAviation Service Department, Yantai Engineering & Technology College, Yantai 264006, China.

Shubin YangSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 22075241Qingchuang Technology Support Program of University in Shandong Province 2021KJ066

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Which functional group shows a stronger affinity for U(VI) and can be introduced into material to enhance selective enrichment? This is crucial for U(VI) capture material design and evaluation. Following these questions, we herein compared and analyzed bare graphene, graphene oxide (GO), and carboxylated graphene oxide (GO-COOH) through experimental and theoretical calculations. Experiments show that U(VI) adsorption on GO-COOH (

Indexed as

chemical affinity-COOH group-OH groupU(VI) enrichment

Identifiers

PMID39683773

DOI10.3390/molecules29235614

PMCPMC11643956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.