ArticleNutrients2024
Eliminating Digestive Irregularities Caused by Late Effects: A Pilot Study of an Innovative Culinary Nutrition Intervention for Reducing Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Gynecologic Cancer Patients Who Have Undergone Pelvic Radiotherapy.
Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Culinary Nutrition Interventions for Those Living with and Beyond Cancer and Their Support Networks: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPelvic radiotherapy (RT) improves survival in gynecologic cancer patients but often results in gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, affecting quality of life. Standard nutrition guidance lacks specificity for these survivors, complicating dietary choices. To address this gap, the EDIBLE intervention was developed to offer structured dietary self-management skills to alleviate RT-induced GI toxicity.
methodsWe conducted a single-arm mixed-methods pilot of the EDIBLE intervention among post-treatment gynecologic cancer survivors to assess its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects on GI symptoms, knowledge, and self-efficacy, with measures at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), and after 3 months (T3).
resultsQualitative interviews supported strong perceptions of intervention feasibility; however, the recruitment (32%) and retention (72%) rates were modest, indicating that alternate formats for program delivery may be needed to make it more accessible. The acceptability of the EDIBLE intervention garnered especially high ratings on measures of satisfaction and utility, with program improvements largely rallying around a desire for increased in-class sessions and program expansion. Statistically significant improvements were observed at the three-month mark (T3), such as enhanced confidence in culinary practices, increased knowledge and skills with regard to managing GI side effects, and improvements in bowel and GI symptoms.
conclusionsThe results suggest EDIBLE is acceptable, improving GI symptoms and self-efficacy; however, moderate recruitment rates indicate refinement is needed. A randomized control trial and cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to confirm effectiveness and scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.