ArticleNutrients2024
Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Personalized nutrition in haemodialysis: a scoping review of studies published between 2015 and 2025.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) on different nutritional outcomes.
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis for a "routinely collected data bank" in a multicenter cohort, conducted on consecutive malnourished or at-risk of malnutrition patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis who underwent IDPN with a three-in-one parenteral nutrition formula for a period ≥ 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the mean change in the malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) score between baseline and the last follow-up visit on IDPN.
resultsFifty-six patients were included. The mean age was 72.4 ± 12.0 years, and 24 (42.9%) were women. In the overall study sample, MIS significantly decreased from 16.4 (95%CI: 15.3-17.65) at baseline to 14.3 (95%CI: 12.8-15.8) at the last follow-up visit on IDPN (
conclusionsIDPN was associated with a significant improvement in the nutritional profile. Notably, our research found that the administration of IDPN over a duration > 3 months significantly improved the nutritional status of patients evaluated by the MIS test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.