Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39683076›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Straw Returning Methods Affects Macro-Aggregate Content and Organic Matter Content in Black Soils: Meta-Analysis and Comprehensive Validation.

Kangmeng Liu, Yu Hu, Yumei Li, Lei Wang, Liang Jin, Lianfeng Cai, Xiaoxiao Wu, Zhenguo Yang, Yan Li, Dan Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kangmeng LiuCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Yu HuCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Yumei LiHeilongjiang Academy of Black Soil Protection and Utilization, Harbin 150086, China.
Lei WangInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.
Liang JinInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4544-7645
Lianfeng CaiCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Xiaoxiao WuCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Zhenguo YangCollege of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Yan LiHeilongjiang Academy of Black Soil Protection and Utilization, Harbin 150086, China.
Dan WeiInstitute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China.

Funding

China Ministry of Science and Technology Basic Resources Investigation 2021FY100406National Key Research and Development Plan of China 2022YFD1601102Special Funding Project for Science and Technology Innovation Capacity Building of Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences KJCX20230219This research was funded by National Key Research and Development Plan of China 2023YFD1500501UNDP Project cpr/21/401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Straw returning into the soil is a crucial method for boosting soil carbon levels. To research the influence of straw return practices on soil aggregates and organic matter content within the farmlands of the Northeast Black Soil Region, the objective was to clarify the varying impacts of these practices on soil carbon enhancement. In this study, 89 pertinent papers were acquired through a rigorous literature compilation. Meta-analysis and the linear regression method were employed to analyze the influence of field return methods, their duration on soil water-stable aggregates, and their organic matter content. Furthermore, the study delved into the trends in the variation of aggregates and organic matter in relation to mean annual temperature and precipitation. Our results showed that the straw-returning method has been discovered to predominantly bolster soil organic matter by altering the proportions of macro-aggregate content. Specifically, straw incorporation has led to a notable enhancement in the content of macro-aggregates (57.14%) and micro-aggregates (20.29%), in addition to augmenting the content of macro-, small, and micro-aggregate organic matter by 13.22%, 16.43%, and 15.08%, respectively. The most significant increase in large agglomerates was witnessed in straw return over a period of more than 5 years (115.17%), as well as shallow mixing return (87.32%). Meanwhile, the highest increase in the organic matter content of large agglomerates was recorded in straw return over 5 years (12.60%) and deep mixing return (8.72%). In the field validation experiment, a period of seven years of straw return significantly boosted the macro-aggregate content across various soil layers, ranging from 11.78% to 116.21%. Furthermore, among the various climatic factors, the primary determinants of disparities in study outcomes were the average annual temperature and average annual precipitation. Specifically, lower precipitation and higher temperatures were conducive to the enhancement of macro-aggregate formation and organic matter content.

Indexed as

meta-analysisNortheast Black Soil Regionorganic matterstraw returnwater-stable agglomerates

Identifiers

PMID39683076
PMCPMC11644226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.