Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682978›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Meta-Analysis on the Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Ozonated Water Treatments for Fresh Produce Washing-Effect of Ozonation Methods.

Haknyeong Hong, Marissa Faye Rizzi, Danhui Wang, Lynne McLandsborough, Jiakai Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haknyeong HongDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01002, USA.
Marissa Faye RizziDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01002, USA.
Danhui WangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX 76204, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3855-4733
Lynne McLandsboroughDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01002, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0977-2352
Jiakai LuDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01002, USA.

Funding

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture AFRI project 2020-03324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the lack of a pathogen-killing process, foodborne outbreaks from contaminated fresh produce have been increasing worldwide. Hence, it is increasingly recognized that the washing step with sanitizers is important to control microbial contamination. Ozonated water is suggested as a substitute for chlorine-based sanitizers, addressing concerns about the effectiveness and environmental impact of chlorine-based sanitizers. However, using ozone as a sanitizer in the fresh produce washing process is still challenging because of its unstable and inconsistent antimicrobial effectiveness under various testing conditions. A meta-analysis was focused on the comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness between different ozonation methods commonly adopted in laboratory settings, including stationary pre-ozonated water, agitated pre-ozonated water, and sparging. The meta-analysis showed that the sparging method results in the highest microbial log reduction compared to other methods. We further developed meta-regression models based on three ozonation methods to identify key processing variables influencing the antimicrobial effectiveness of ozonated water. Attempts were made to link key processing variables to ozone stability and the mass transport phenomena involved in the washing process. This research will contribute to designing and developing a washing process to increase fresh produce safety by identifying key factors in each ozonation method and facilitate interlaboratory comparison studies.

Indexed as

antimicrobial effectivenessfresh producemeta-analysismeta-regressionozonated waterwashing process

Identifiers

PMID39682978
PMCPMC11640341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.