Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682957›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Investigating the Effects of Acid Hydrolysis on Physicochemical Properties of Quinoa and Faba Bean Starches as Compared to Cassava Starch.

Anthony Halim, Peter J Torley, Asgar Farahnaky, Mahsa Majzoobi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anthony HalimDiscipline of Biosciences and Food Technology, RMIT University, Bundoora West Campus, Plenty Road, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Peter J TorleyDiscipline of Biosciences and Food Technology, RMIT University, Bundoora West Campus, Plenty Road, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-0185
Asgar FarahnakyDiscipline of Biosciences and Food Technology, RMIT University, Bundoora West Campus, Plenty Road, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.
Mahsa MajzoobiDiscipline of Biosciences and Food Technology, RMIT University, Bundoora West Campus, Plenty Road, Melbourne, VIC 3083, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0048-7707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the growing demand for high-quality food ingredients, starches from underutilised sources like quinoa and faba bean are gaining attention due to their unique properties and high tolerance to adverse environmental conditions. Acid hydrolysis is a well-established chemical method for producing modified starch with improved solubility, lower gelatinisation temperature, and reduced pasting viscosity. However, various outcomes can be achieved depending on the type of starch and modification conditions. This study comparatively investigated the effects of acid hydrolysis on the functional and physicochemical properties of emerging starches from quinoa and faba bean, with cassava starch serving as a reference from a leading source. The results demonstrated increased dietary fibre content across all three starches, with faba bean starch showing the most significant rise. Acid treatment also enhanced the crystallinity of the starches, with faba bean starch exhibiting the highest increase in relative crystallinity, which led to a shift towards higher temperatures in their thermal properties. Additionally, water solubility and oil adsorption capacity increased, while swelling power decreased following acid treatment. The acid treatment reduced the pasting properties of all samples, indicating that the modified starches were more resistant to heating and shearing in the rapid visco analyser. While quinoa starch gel remained soft after acid hydrolysis, the gel strength of cassava and faba bean starches improved significantly, making them suitable as plant-based gelling agents.

Indexed as

acid hydrolysisacid thinningcassava starchemerging starchesfaba bean starchquinoa starchunderutilised starches

Identifiers

PMID39682957
PMCPMC11640631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.