ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
From Binary to Multi-Class Classification: A Two-Step Hybrid CNN-ViT Model for Chest Disease Classification Based on X-Ray Images.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical validation of lightweight CNN architectures for reliable multi-class classification of lung cancer using histopathological imaging techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- C-ViT: An Improved ViT Model for Multi-Label Classification of Bamboo Chopstick Defects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A monotonic multi-expert Vision Transformer for clinically reliable chest X-ray classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- SPX-GNN: An Explainable Graph Neural Network for Harnessing Long-Range Dependencies in Tuberculosis Classifications in Chest X-Ray Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Detection Techniques-A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Enhanced CoAtNet based hybrid deep learning architecture for automated tuberculosis detection in human chest X-rays.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesChest disease identification for Tuberculosis and Pneumonia diseases presents diagnostic challenges due to overlapping radiographic features and the limited availability of expert radiologists, especially in developing countries. The present study aims to address these challenges by developing a Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) system to provide consistent and objective analyses of chest X-ray images, thereby reducing potential human error. By leveraging the complementary strengths of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs), we propose a hybrid model for the accurate detection of Tuberculosis and for distinguishing between Tuberculosis and Pneumonia.
methodsWe designed a two-step hybrid model that integrates the ResNet-50 CNN with the ViT-b16 architecture. It uses the transfer learning on datasets from
resultsOur hybrid CNN-ViT model achieved a binary classification accuracy of 98.97% for Tuberculosis detection. For multi-class classification, distinguishing between Tuberculosis, viral Pneumonia, and bacterial Pneumonia, the model achieved an accuracy of 96.18%. These results underscore the model's potential in improving diagnostic accuracy and reliability for chest disease classification based on X-ray images.
conclusionsThe proposed hybrid CNN-ViT model demonstrates substantial potential in advancing the accuracy and robustness of CAD systems for chest disease diagnosis. By integrating CNN and ViT architectures, our approach enhances the diagnostic precision, which may help to alleviate the burden on healthcare systems in resource-limited settings and improve patient outcomes in chest disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.