Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682661›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

The Evaluation of Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Initial Staging in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.

Laura Evangelista, Priscilla Guglielmo, Giulia Giacoppo, Lucia Setti, Demetrio Aricò, Lorenzo Muraglia, Katia Marzo, Nicolò Buffi, Vittorio Fasulo, Marcello Rodari and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. PSMA-Targeted radiopharmaceuticals: from diagnosis to risk & quality of life.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Laura EvangelistaNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5955-9488
Priscilla GuglielmoNuclear Medicine Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.
Giulia GiacoppoNuclear Medicine Unit, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Misterbianco, Italy.
Lucia SettiNuclear Medicine Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7035-0511
Demetrio AricòNuclear Medicine Unit, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Misterbianco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5798-9943
Lorenzo MuragliaNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.
Katia MarzoNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.
Nicolò BuffiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Vittorio FasuloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Marcello RodariNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9419-8964
Jelena JandricNuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.
Antonio SalvaggioUrology Unit, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, 95045 Catania, Italy.
Manuela BonacinaNuclear Medicine Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2940-2460
Massimo LazzeriUrology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy.
Giovanni LughezzaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3939-4521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the present study was to assess the performance of radiolabeled-PSMA PET/CT in a cohort of intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients for initial staging.

methodsThis is a retrospective, multicenter analysis of patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk PCa who were staged using radiolabeled PSMA PET/CT to evaluate the extent of the disease before initiating appropriate treatment. The study included patients from the Nuclear Medicine Units of the Humanitas group between 2021 and 2024. The change in management due to the PSMA PET/CT examination was assessed.

resultsA total of 181 patients were enrolled across all three centers. Histopathological assessment from biopsy revealed that 51.4% of patients had favorable PCa, while 48.6% had unfavorable disease. PET/CT was positive for the primary lesions in all patients, but it revealed a positivity rate in 23 (12.7%) patients for nodes and distant organs, with a positivity rate of 0.21 in the unfavorable group and 0.05 in the favorable group (

conclusionsPSMA PET/CT can affect the management of patients with intermediate-risk PCa in up to 13% of cases, mainly for unfavorable diseases. New imaging techniques as a first-line imaging procedure can help to plan the correct therapeutic approach in the intermediate-risk PCa group.

Indexed as

change in managementdiagnostic performanceintermediate riskprostate cancerPSMA PET/CT

Identifiers

PMID39682661
PMCPMC11640276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.