Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682649›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Quality Assessment of MRI-Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Methods in Classification of Brain Tumors: Systematic Review.

Shailesh S Nayak, Saikiran Pendem, Girish R Menon, Niranjana Sampathila, Prakashini Koteshwar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shailesh S NayakManipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6548-8092
Saikiran PendemManipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Girish R MenonKasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Niranjana SampathilaManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3345-360X
Prakashini KoteshwarKasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain tumors present a complex challenge in clinical oncology, where precise diagnosis and classification are pivotal for effective treatment planning. Radiomics, a burgeoning field in neuro-oncology, involves extracting and analyzing numerous quantitative features from medical images. This approach captures subtle spatial and textural information imperceptible to the human eye. However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant, and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles focused on the use of radiomics for brain tumors from 2015 based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The radiomic features train machine learning models for glioma classification, and data are split into training and testing subsets to validate the model accuracy, reliability, and generalizability. The present study systematically reviews the status of radiomic studies concerning brain tumors, also using the radiomics quality score (RQS) to assess the quality of the methodology used in each study.

resultsA systematic search of PubMed identified 300 articles, with 18 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. These studies collectively demonstrate the potential of radiomics-based machine learning models in accurately distinguishing between glioma subtypes and grades. Various imaging modalities, including MRI, PET/CT, and advanced techniques like ASL and DTI, were utilized to extract radiomic features for analysis. Machine learning algorithms such as deep learning networks, support vector machines, random forests, and logistic regression were applied to develop predictive models.

conclusionsThe present study indicates high accuracies in glioma classification, outperforming traditional imaging methods and inexperienced radiologists in some cases. Further validation and standardization efforts are warranted to facilitate the clinical integration of radiomics into routine practice, ultimately enhancing glioma management and patient outcomes. Open science practices: Machine learning using MRI radiomic features provides a simple, noninvasive, and cost-effective method for glioma classification, enhancing transparency, reproducibility, and collaboration within the scientific community.

Indexed as

differential diagnosisGliomaradiomicsradiomics quality scoretexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID39682649
PMCPMC11639919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.