Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682605›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Schizophrenia Detection and Classification: A Systematic Review of the Last Decade.

Arghyasree Saha, Seungmin Park, Zong Woo Geem, Pawan Kumar Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arghyasree SahaDepartment of Information Technology, Jadavpur University, Jadavpur University Second Campus, Plot No. 8, Salt Lake Bypass, LB Block, Sector III, Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700106, West Bengal, India.ORCID 0009-0006-5879-6445
Seungmin ParkDepartment of Software, Dongseo University, Busan 47011, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3307-9865
Zong Woo GeemCollege of IT Convergence, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0370-5562
Pawan Kumar SinghDepartment of Information Technology, Jadavpur University, Jadavpur University Second Campus, Plot No. 8, Salt Lake Bypass, LB Block, Sector III, Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700106, West Bengal, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9598-7981

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1G1A1012554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesArtificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare employs advanced algorithms to analyze complex and large-scale datasets, mimicking aspects of human cognition. By automating decision-making processes based on predefined thresholds, AI enhances the accuracy and reliability of healthcare data analysis, reducing the need for human intervention. Schizophrenia (SZ), a chronic mental health disorder affecting millions globally, is characterized by symptoms such as auditory hallucinations, paranoia, and disruptions in thought, behavior, and perception. The SZ symptoms can significantly impair daily functioning, underscoring the need for advanced diagnostic tools.

methodsThis systematic review has been conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines and examines peer-reviewed studies from the last decade (2015-2024) on AI applications in SZ detection as well as classification. The review protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number: CRD42024612364. Research has been sourced from multiple databases and screened using predefined inclusion criteria. The review evaluates the use of both Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) methods across multiple modalities, including Electroencephalography (EEG), Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (sMRI), and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). The key aspects reviewed include datasets, preprocessing techniques, and AI models.

resultsThe review identifies significant advancements in AI methods for SZ diagnosis, particularly in the efficacy of ML and DL models for feature extraction, classification, and multi-modal data integration. It highlights state-of-the-art AI techniques and synthesizes insights into their potential to improve diagnostic outcomes. Additionally, the analysis underscores common challenges, including dataset limitations, variability in preprocessing approaches, and the need for more interpretable models.

conclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive evaluation of AI-based methods in SZ prognosis, emphasizing the strengths and limitations of current approaches. By identifying unresolved gaps, it offers valuable directions for future research in the application of AI for SZ detection and diagnosis.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningEEG signalsmachine learningMRI scansschizophrenia detectionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39682605
PMCPMC11640697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.