ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Deep Learning-Based Object Detection Strategies for Disease Detection and Localization in Chest X-Ray Images.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Leukocyte Dynamics: Functional Biomarkers and Precision Diagnostics in Parasitic Infections.Acta parasitologica · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Quantification of Longitudinal HRCT Changes During Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: An Exploratory Proof-of-Concept Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CXR-MultiTaskNet a unified deep learning framework for joint disease localization and classification in chest radiographs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Editorial for the Special Issue "Advances in Medical Image Processing, Segmentation, and Classification".Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesChest X-ray (CXR) images are commonly used to diagnose respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. However, traditional manual interpretation is often subjective, time-consuming, and prone to errors, leading to inconsistent detection accuracy and poor generalization. In this paper, we present deep learning-based object detection methods for automatically identifying and annotating abnormal regions in CXR images.
methodsWe developed and tested our models using disease-labeled CXR images and location-bounding boxes from E-Da Hospital. Given the prevalence of normal images over diseased ones in clinical settings, we created various training datasets and approaches to assess how different proportions of background images impact model performance. To address the issue of limited examples for certain diseases, we also investigated few-shot object detection techniques. We compared convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Transformer-based models to determine the most effective architecture for medical image analysis.
resultsThe findings show that background image proportions greatly influenced model inference. Moreover, schemes incorporating binary classification consistently improved performance, and CNN-based models outperformed Transformer-based models across all scenarios.
conclusionsWe have developed a more efficient and reliable system for the automated detection of disease labels and location bounding boxes in CXR images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.