ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Session-by-Session Prediction of Anti-Endothelial Growth Factor Injection Needs in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Optical-Coherence-Tomography-Derived Features and Machine Learning.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The controversial role of nutraceuticals vs. drugs in proliferative retinopathies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesNeovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a retinal disorder leading to irreversible central vision loss. The pro-re-nata (PRN) treatment for nAMD involves frequent intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF medications, placing a burden on patients and healthcare systems. Predicting injections needs at each monitoring session could optimize treatment outcomes and reduce unnecessary interventions.
methodsTo achieve these aims, machine learning (ML) models were evaluated using different combinations of clinical variables, including retinal thickness and volume, best-corrected visual acuity, and features derived from macular optical coherence tomography (OCT). A "Leave Some Subjects Out" (LSSO) nested cross-validation approach ensured robust evaluation. Moreover, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to quantify the contribution of each feature to model predictions.
resultsResults demonstrated that models incorporating both structural and functional features achieved high classification accuracy in predicting injection necessity (AUC = 0.747 ± 0.046, MCC = 0.541 ± 0.073). Moreover, the explainability analysis identified as key predictors both subretinal and intraretinal fluid, alongside central retinal thickness.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that session-by-session prediction of injection needs in nAMD patients is feasible, even without processing the entire OCT image. The proposed ML framework has the potential to be integrated into routine clinical workflows, thereby optimizing nAMD therapeutic management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.