Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682484›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Physical Measures of Welfare in Fin (

Anik Boileau, Jonathan Blais, Marie-Françoise Van Bressem, Kathleen E Hunt, Jamie Ahloy-Dallaire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Successful Rescue of a Juvenile Humpback Whale (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Skin disorders in free-ranging Chilean dolphins (Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anik BoileauFaculté des Sciences Animales, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1622-1217
Jonathan BlaisCentre d'Éducation et de Recherche de Sept-Îles, Sept-Îles, QC G4R 2Y8, Canada.
Marie-Françoise Van BressemCetacean Conservation Medicine Group, Peruvian Centre for Cetacean Research, Museo de Delfines, Lima 20, Peru.
Kathleen E HuntDepartment of Biology, Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, George Mason University, 1500 Remount Rd, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA.
Jamie Ahloy-DallaireFaculté des Sciences Animales, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6515-4009

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council 466474199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities impacting marine environments are internationally recognized as welfare issues for wild cetaceans. This study validates a first evidence-based physical indicator for the welfare assessment protocol of humpback (n = 50) and fin whales (n = 50) living in a highly anthropized environment. Visual assessments of body condition, skin health, prevalence of injuries and parasite/epibiont loads were performed using a species-specific multi-scale measuring tool. A total of 6403 images were analyzed (fin, n = 3152; humpback, n = 3251) and results were validated through reliability and positive discrimination statistical tests. Based on physical measures, welfare assessment results showed that 60% of humpback whales were considered in a good welfare state compared to only 46% of fin whales. Significant relationships were observed in both species, between environmental parameters like dissolved oxygen levels, and prevalence of cutaneous lesions like pale skin patch syndrome. Furthermore, animals with injuries due to anthropogenic activities were more likely to be in poorer body condition, suggesting chronic stress affecting welfare.

Indexed as

anthropized environmentbody conditionchronic stresscutaneous lesionsentanglementfin whaleshumpback whalesphysical stateswelfare assessment

Identifiers

PMID39682484
PMCPMC11640288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.