ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Research on a High-Efficiency Goat Individual Recognition Method Based on Machine Vision.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DRG-LiteStar-YOLO: Reliability-Guided Pseudo-Depth Fusion for Dairy Goat Detection in Complex Barns.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- HST-former: hierarchical spatio-temporal aggregation for video-based animal re-identification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of individual goat identity is necessary for precision farming. Previous studies have primarily focused on using front face images for goat identification, leaving the potential of other appearances and multi-source appearance fusion unexplored. In this study, we used a self-developed multi-view appearance image acquisition platform to capture five different appearances (left face, right face, front face, back body, and side body) from 54 Wanlin white goats. The recognition ability of different goat appearance images and its multi-source appearance fusion for its identity recognition was then systematically examined based on the four basic network models, namely, MobileNetV3, MobileViT, ResNet18, and VGG16, and the best combination of goat appearance and network was screened. When only one kind of goat appearance image was used, the combination of side body image and MobileViT was the best, with an accuracy of 99.63%; under identity recognition based on multi-source image appearance fusion, all recognition models after outlook fusion of two viewpoints generally outperformed single viewpoint appearance identity recognition models in recognizing the identity of individual goats; when three or more kinds of goat appearance images were utilized for fusion, any of the four models were capable of identifying the identity of an individual goat with 100% accuracy. Based on these results, a goat individual identity recognition strategy was proposed that balances accuracy, computation, and time, providing new ideas for goat individual identity recognition in complex farming contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.