Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39682469›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Equine Asthma Diagnostics: Review of Influencing Factors and Difficulties in Diagnosing Subclinical Disease.

Lioba Lendl, Ann Kristin Barton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lioba LendlEquine Clinic Hochmoor, Ruthmannstr. 10, 48712 Gescher, Germany.
Ann Kristin BartonEquine Clinic Hochmoor, Ruthmannstr. 10, 48712 Gescher, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3333-9647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This literature review focuses on diagnostics of equine asthma (EA), possible influencing factors on diagnostic techniques and latest developments in diagnosing horses during EA remission or with subclinical disease. Routine EA diagnostics include a clinical examination of the respiratory system with percussion and auscultation including a rebreathing examination, and clinical pathology including white blood cells and arterial blood gas analysis. Subsequent diagnostics include bronchoscopy to evaluate the amount and viscosity of respiratory secretion, bronchoalveolar lavage, and the cytology of tracheal aspirates (TAs) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). The grading of EA severity is built on respiratory effort at rest, which is increased in severe equine asthma. The inflammatory subtype is based on BALF cytology, while TA cytology helps to rule out previous bacterial infections. Different factors have an impact on the airways regarding the structure of the epithelium, cytology, and inflammatory markers possibly influencing the diagnosis of EA. Short-term exercise increases the total cell count and inflammatory mediators identified in the BALF of human patients, asymptomatic horses, and other species. Other factors involve cold or chlorinated air, long-term training effects, and concurrent additional respiratory disease, in particular exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage. As BALF cytology may be unremarkable during EA remission and low-grade disease, exercise tests and other factors stressing the bronchial epithelium may help to diagnose these patients.

Indexed as

chronic respiratory diseasehorseinflammatory airway disease

Identifiers

PMID39682469
PMCPMC11640047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.