ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Evaluation of the Breed Composition of Pork via Population Structure Analysis in Pigs.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The quality of pork meat directly influences the price and consumption. The genetic improvement of pigs has mainly focused on high productive efficiency, which has resulted in poor meat quality. Crossbreeds containing commercial and indigenous breeds could improve the meat quality, but identifying breed composition was difficult because of the lack of an ancestry reference panel. Therefore, we first constructed an abundant reference panel and convenient pipeline to identify ancestry/breed composition. The ancestry reference panel consisted of 517 reliable individuals, including three commercial breeds (Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire) and 38 indigenous Chinese breeds. The nature of the reference panel showed that the European domestic breed (EUD) and Asian domestic breed (ASD) were distinctly divided into two clusters. The evaluation of ancestry identification revealed that the reference panel performed well in identifying EUD and ASD ancestry proportions for commercial breeds, indigenous breeds, and crossbreeds. In addition, the ancestry reference panel also performed excellently in identifying breed composition for 3 commercial and 38 indigenous breeds. Specifically, the reference panel showed the outstanding identification of breed composition for crossbred individuals. These results suggested that the ancestry reference panel and convenient pipeline played a good role in identifying breed composition for pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.